Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
2
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Published:Friday, 11th Oct 2024 Source: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has expressed concerns regarding Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed A$1.35 billion acquisition of the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia's (RAC) insurance business. The ACCC warns that this deal could significantly reduce competition in Western Australia's motor and home insurance markets, potentially leading to higher premiums and diminished service quality for consumers. - read more
Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has highlighted the growing impact of climate change on home insurance premiums in Australia. The insurer reports that increasingly frequent and severe weather events are contributing to higher costs for homeowners seeking coverage. - read more
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced legal proceedings against RACQ Insurance, a subsidiary of Insurance Australia Group (IAG), alleging that the insurer misled over 570,000 customers between September 2019 and December 2024. The regulator claims that RACQ included inflated 'last period premium' amounts in renewal notices, potentially causing customers to pay more than necessary. - read more
The Australian Amusement Leisure & Recreation Association (AALARA) has raised concerns over the escalating costs of public liability insurance, which are placing significant pressure on amusement and recreation operators across the country. This warning follows the Insurance Council of Australia's (ICA) recent call for reforms to civil liability laws. - read more
A recent report by the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) has revealed that small businesses in Australia are paying up to 30% more for their insurance premiums due to taxes and levies imposed by state and territory governments. This financial burden is leading to a worrying trend where an increasing number of small businesses are either underinsuring or forgoing insurance altogether. - read more
Every restaurant owner needs to be familiar with the term 'public liability insurance'. This type of insurance is designed to protect your business financially in case a customer or a member of the public suffers an injury or property damage as a result of your business operations. In a bustling restaurant environment, accidents can happen—the risk of slips, spills, and other mishaps is ever-present. - read more
As the owner of a retail store, you may not realize that the day-to-day interactions with customers and the public pose significant financial risks. Whether it's a customer slipping on a wet floor or a product causing harm, the threat of negligence claims is all too real. This is where Public Liability Insurance becomes not just a safety net, but a fundamental necessity for your business operations. - read more
Public liability insurance is a cornerstone of protection for businesses, offering a shield against claims for personal injury or property damage inflicted on third parties as a result of their operations. As manufacturers open their doors to employees, suppliers, and sometimes the public, they navigate a landscape rife with potential hazards. Public liability insurance becomes not just a safety net, but an essential aspect of responsible entrepreneurship. - read more
When embarking on a construction project, the potential for unexpected incidents and the associated liabilities cannot be ignored. Navigating through the intricate world of insurance might seem daunting, but understanding public liability insurance can save your business from financial peril. In the ever-evolving landscape of Australian construction, its significance cannot be overstated. - read more
Public liability insurance is a critical form of coverage that protects businesses against claims of injury or damage caused by their operations to members of the public. Its primary purpose is to cover legal costs and compensation payments, which can otherwise cripple a business financially. - read more
Knowledgebase
Insurance Deductible: the amount that an insured is required to contribute toward an insurance claim as stipulated in an insurance policy. Otherwise known as the "policy excess".
