Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) Enhanced Regulatory Sandbox (ERS), introduced in 2020 to facilitate financial innovation, has been deemed ineffective in fostering advancements within the insurance sector. Insurtech Australia (IA) has expressed concerns that, despite ASIC's genuine efforts, the ERS has not significantly impacted the insurance industry or the insurtech ecosystem. ([insurancenews.com.au](https://www.insurancenews.com.au/insurtech/asic-s-insurance-innovation-initiatives-ineffective?utm_source=openai)) - read more
The Australian commercial insurance market has witnessed a notable decline in premium rates, with a 12% drop recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025. This marks the largest decrease among the eight regions monitored by Marsh Risk's Global Insurance Market Index. ([insurancenews.com.au](https://www.insurancenews.com.au/the-broker/australia-leads-way-as-commercial-rate-slide-continues?utm_source=openai)) - read more
The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently released a white paper highlighting the urgent need for reforms to state and territory civil liability laws, which have remained largely unchanged for nearly 25 years. These outdated laws are contributing to significant increases in public liability insurance premiums, affecting a wide range of businesses across the nation. - read more
The Australian insurance industry has experienced a notable decline in profits during the December quarter, primarily due to severe hailstorms that occurred in October and November. According to data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), the general insurance sector reported a net profit of $132 million for the quarter, bringing the annual total to approximately $5.8 billion. This marks a decrease from the $6.8 billion profit recorded in 2024. - read more
A recent landmark ruling in New South Wales has significantly altered the liability landscape for the construction industry. The court's decision removes the ability for developers and builders to rely on proportionate liability defences under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act), thereby increasing their exposure to claims related to building defects. - read more
For any Australian business, the unforeseeable mishaps that can occur daily pose potential risks not only to operational continuity but also to financial stability. At the core of a strategic risk management plan lies the essential protective layer of public liability insurance, a shield safeguarding businesses from the legal and financial repercussions of accidents and injuries that may happen on their premises, or as a result of their operations. - read more
If you're a tradesperson, safeguarding your business is not just about having the right tools and skills, but also ensuring you're protected against unexpected events on site. Public Liability Insurance plays a crucial role in your safety net, providing a shield against potential financial setbacks caused by accidents and injuries. - read more
Engaging with contractors and suppliers is an integral facet of many business operations, fostering growth and expansion. However, with this collaboration comes inherent risks that can impact a business financially and legally, should any unexpected incidents arise. It is here that liability insurance steps in as a cornerstone of risk management, safeguarding businesses from potential pitfalls associated with these partnerships. - read more
Public liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect business owners against claims made by third parties for injuries or damages that occur in connection with business operations. - read more
Running a gym or fitness center comes with unique responsibilities, especially when it comes to providing a safe environment for clients. In this dynamic space, where individuals engage in activities that may pose risks, it is imperative for gym owners to understand the importance of public liability insurance. This type of coverage is a cornerstone for safeguarding your business against claims arising from accidental injuries or property damage to third parties. - read more
Knowledgebase
Reinsurance: Insurance that an insurance company purchases from another insurance company to mitigate risk.
