A Vintage Car Owner Faces Claims Rejection After Repair Nightmare

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Pontiac, originally purchased from the United States in 2014, was in need of refurbishment to restore its former glory by 2021. In December of that year, the car owner approached a repair shop, designated here as Shop N, which provided a restoration estimate of $12,000. Little did he know that this choice would lead him down a troublesome path.

By July 2022, the owner became increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress on his vehicle. In an effort to reclaim his car, he arranged for a former employee of Shop N, referred to here as Shop C, to retrieve the vehicle. However, he claimed that Shop N refused to release the car, leading him to lodge a theft report with his insurance company, SGUAS.

In a strange twist, the owner later revealed to SGUAS that the vehicle had indeed been found. He stated that Shop C had taken the car after allegedly threatening the repair shop's owner. With the car in Shop C’s possession, the owner paid $6,000 for necessary repairs, believing his vehicle was in capable hands.

Despite assurances that work was progressing smoothly, the owner’s confidence waned when he could not ascertain the storage location of his car. When he visited Shop C’s facility in March 2023, he was informed that his vehicle was unavailable, sparking another theft report when communication broke down.

As investigations unfolded, it became apparent that Shop C had stored the Pontiac in a paid location but had failed to prevent damage from corrosion and missing parts. The insurer SGUAS ultimately denied the owner’s claims, asserting the circumstances did not qualify as theft. They reasoned that since the owner had permitted both Shop N and Shop C to handle his vehicle, it could not be considered stolen.

This ruling, released by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), clarified that while the claim was rooted in distressing events, it did not meet the criteria for theft as defined under the insurance policy. Both repairers were found to have inadequate responses to queries regarding the car's condition, but AFCA concluded that the owner's authorization to the repairers negated the theft claim.

“It is not clear whether the damage is malicious or just a byproduct of negligence,” AFCA detailed in its findings. The report indicated that Shop C, after disassembling parts of the vehicle, exhibited an inability or unwillingness to complete the repairs, further complicating the ordeal.

The AFCA noted, “The situation is significant and distressing for the claimant,” nonetheless confirming that the terms of the insurance policy would not cover the circumstances described. Insurance experts recommend that vehicle owners conduct thorough due diligence before committing to a repair shop, ensuring clear agreements and regular updates throughout the repair process.

For classic car enthusiasts, these cases serve as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in restoration work and the critical importance of safeguarding their investments through comprehensive insurance knowledge and proactive communication with service providers.

Source: Insurance News Magazine

Published:Tuesday, 31st Dec 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

General Insurance Code Review Puts Service Standards in Focus

21 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s general insurance sector is edging closer to a significant reset of its customer service rulebook, with Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino indicating he wants meaningful progress on the long-running review of the General Insurance Code of Practice. A draft of the revised code is expected to move towards consultation shortly, following a review process that began in November 2023 and produced more than 100 recommendations in late 2024. - read more

APRA Data Highlights Rising Public Liability Insurance Costs

14 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest National Claims and Policies Database (NCPD) statistics, revealing a substantial increase in public liability insurance premiums over recent years. Since 2015, premiums have risen by 40%, outpacing general inflation and placing additional financial strain on businesses across the country. - read more

Melbourne's Pride of our Footscray Nightclub Confronts Insurance Challenges

14 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Melbourne's vibrant nightlife is under threat as venues like Pride of our Footscray grapple with escalating public liability insurance premiums. The popular nightclub has been deemed 'uninsurable' for two years, reflecting a broader crisis affecting small businesses across Australia. - read more

ICA Advocates for Overhaul of Civil Liability Laws to Ease Insurance Burden

07 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently called for urgent reforms to outdated state and territory civil liability laws, highlighting their significant contribution to the rising insurance costs faced by small businesses and community organisations. These laws, many of which have not been reviewed in nearly 25 years, are increasingly seen as inadequate in addressing the complexities of modern liability claims. - read more

ACCC Approves Uniting Church's National Insurance Purchasing Program

07 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has granted a six-year authorisation for the Uniting Church's national insurance purchasing program, a move anticipated to reduce premiums and deliver better outcomes for the organisation's diverse operations. - read more

Click for more Insurance News