Insured Value Disputes: A Closer Look at Claims Resolution

A recent case has sparked significant discussion around the complexities of insurance claims, focusing specifically on the insured value of personal items like jewelry.

A claimant who had a gold necklace insured for $31,500 found himself at odds with his insurer, QBE, after reporting the item's loss.

Following the claim submission under his home and contents policy, QBE offered to arrange a replacement through a designated jeweler, referred to as Jeweler P. However, the claimant sought a cash settlement instead, prompting QBE to offer $15,048, which reflected the jeweler’s estimate for a suitable substitute.

Frustrated with the compensation amount, the claimant requested the full insured value, raising concerns about the jeweler's qualifications and output quality. This scenario highlights a crucial issue: the perceived mismatch between insured sums and actual claim settlements.

According to the ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the determination of the claimant's compensation was chiefly based on the actual replacement costs rather than the insured amount or premium that had been paid. “The relevant consideration for the purposes of the complainant’s claim is the actual cost the insurer would incur to replace the necklace,” stated AFCA’s ombudsman.

Adding to the complexity, the claimant expressed doubts regarding Jeweler P's capabilities, citing a negative review dated two years prior. Although AFCA acknowledged the claimant’s concerns about the jeweler's reputation and his belief that the suggested replacement was subpar, these factors did not adequately justify a demand for the full insured amount. The ombudsman concluded, “I am not satisfied these matters entitle the complainant to the outcome he seeks.”

In a further analysis, it was revealed that there were discrepancies in the valuation of the necklace. While the insured necklace weighed approximately 156 grams, Jeweler P’s quote was based on a 150-gram estimate. Following this, AFCA indicated that QBE should reassess the replacement cost to align with the revised details provided by the claimant.

AFCA also denied the claimant's request for additional compensation, emphasizing that many of the delays were predominantly due to his insistence on a resolution that was beyond the policy's provisions. This case underscores the importance of understanding both the terms of an insurance policy and the mechanisms of claims processes, especially when expectations revolve around the insured values of personal property.

This incident serves as a reminder for policyholders: the sum insured may not always equate to the cash settlement in the event of a loss, and insurers are likely to adhere strictly to the actual replacement costs as outlined in policy agreements. To navigate such disputes effectively, clear communication and precise documentation during the claims process are imperative.

Details of this case were shared by Insurance News Magazine, shedding light on the finer points of insurance claims involving high-value personal items.

Published:Monday, 6th Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

QBE Under Scrutiny for Misleading Discount Practices

11 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal action against QBE Insurance, alleging that the insurer misled over 500,000 customers regarding promised discounts on various insurance products. This development underscores the critical importance of transparency and accuracy in the insurance sector, particularly concerning pricing and customer communications. - read more

Upcover's New Management Liability Insurance: A Boon for SMEs

11 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant development for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sole traders across Australia, Sydney-based insurtech company Upcover has unveiled a new management liability insurance product. This offering is designed to provide comprehensive protection against a range of risks, including employment disputes, official investigations, tax audits, financial crimes, statutory liabilities, and allegations of legal breaches. - read more

APRA's Findings: Stability in PI Claims Amid Declining Premiums

11 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest National Claims and Policies Database report, providing insights into the professional indemnity (PI) insurance sector. The data indicates that while claims payments for non-facility business remained relatively stable at $1.111 billion in the 2022 underwriting year, there was a notable 6% decline in gross written premiums, which fell to $2.775 billion from the previous year's $2.954 billion. - read more

Click for more Insurance News

Business Insurance Articles

Top Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing Public Liability Coverage

Public liability insurance stands as a crucial safeguard for businesses, shielding them from the financial repercussions of legal claims. These claims can arise when members of the public suffer damages or injuries in connection with a business's operations. Understanding the basics of this coverage is not just a matter of legal compliance for many businesses, but a proactive step in asset protection. - read more

Why Retail Store Owners Can't Afford to Skip Public Liability Insurance

As the owner of a retail store, you may not realize that the day-to-day interactions with customers and the public pose significant financial risks. Whether it's a customer slipping on a wet floor or a product causing harm, the threat of negligence claims is all too real. This is where Public Liability Insurance becomes not just a safety net, but a fundamental necessity for your business operations. - read more

Understanding Public Liability Insurance: A Must-Have for Aussie Businesses

For any Australian business, the unforeseeable mishaps that can occur daily pose potential risks not only to operational continuity but also to financial stability. At the core of a strategic risk management plan lies the essential protective layer of public liability insurance, a shield safeguarding businesses from the legal and financial repercussions of accidents and injuries that may happen on their premises, or as a result of their operations. - read more

How to Choose the Right Public Liability Insurance Policy for Your Business

When it comes to running a business, safeguarding your financial well-being against unforeseen events is crucial. Public Liability Insurance (PLI) is designed to protect your business from the financial risks associated with claims of property damage, personal injury, or death caused to third parties due to business activities. Understanding this shield of security is the first line of defense in a world where accidents and mishaps are not just possible but often probable. - read more

The Difference Between Public Liability and Other Insurances Explained

Public liability insurance is designed to protect businesses against claims made by the public for injuries or damages that occur in connection with the business operations. It covers legal fees, medical expenses, and compensation costs that may arise if a customer or a member of the public is injured or property is damaged as a result of the business activities. - read more

Knowledgebase

Indemnity:
A legal principle that stipulates that insurance policies should restore the insured to the financial position they were in before the loss.

This website is owned and operated by Clark Family Pty Ltd (as Trustee for the Clark Family Trust) 43 Larch Street Tallebudgera QLD 4228, A.C.N. 010281008, authorised Financial Services Representative of Unique Group Broker Services Pty Ltd, Australian Financial Services License 509434. Visit the ASIC website for additional licensing information.

IMPORTANT: We are neither authorised nor licensed to provide finance or financial products and we do not offer any form of credit or other financial advice. All product enquiries and requests for financial and/or other advice on this website are referred to third party intermediaries, insurers and lenders - with whom you can then deal directly. We may receive a fee or commission from these third parties in consideration for the referral. Before any action is taken to obtain a product or service referred to by this website, advice should be obtained (from either the third party to whom we refer you or from another qualified intermediary) as to the appropriateness of obtaining those products having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Whilst we have our own process for vaidating the legitimacy of our referral partners, you should always verify the credentials of your financial adviser before proceeding with recommendations that they may present. Visit the ASIC website for further information.