Insured Value Disputes: A Closer Look at Claims Resolution

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Following the claim submission under his home and contents policy, QBE offered to arrange a replacement through a designated jeweler, referred to as Jeweler P. However, the claimant sought a cash settlement instead, prompting QBE to offer $15,048, which reflected the jeweler’s estimate for a suitable substitute.

Frustrated with the compensation amount, the claimant requested the full insured value, raising concerns about the jeweler's qualifications and output quality. This scenario highlights a crucial issue: the perceived mismatch between insured sums and actual claim settlements.

According to the ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the determination of the claimant's compensation was chiefly based on the actual replacement costs rather than the insured amount or premium that had been paid. “The relevant consideration for the purposes of the complainant’s claim is the actual cost the insurer would incur to replace the necklace,” stated AFCA’s ombudsman.

Adding to the complexity, the claimant expressed doubts regarding Jeweler P's capabilities, citing a negative review dated two years prior. Although AFCA acknowledged the claimant’s concerns about the jeweler's reputation and his belief that the suggested replacement was subpar, these factors did not adequately justify a demand for the full insured amount. The ombudsman concluded, “I am not satisfied these matters entitle the complainant to the outcome he seeks.”

In a further analysis, it was revealed that there were discrepancies in the valuation of the necklace. While the insured necklace weighed approximately 156 grams, Jeweler P’s quote was based on a 150-gram estimate. Following this, AFCA indicated that QBE should reassess the replacement cost to align with the revised details provided by the claimant.

AFCA also denied the claimant's request for additional compensation, emphasizing that many of the delays were predominantly due to his insistence on a resolution that was beyond the policy's provisions. This case underscores the importance of understanding both the terms of an insurance policy and the mechanisms of claims processes, especially when expectations revolve around the insured values of personal property.

This incident serves as a reminder for policyholders: the sum insured may not always equate to the cash settlement in the event of a loss, and insurers are likely to adhere strictly to the actual replacement costs as outlined in policy agreements. To navigate such disputes effectively, clear communication and precise documentation during the claims process are imperative.

Details of this case were shared by Insurance News Magazine, shedding light on the finer points of insurance claims involving high-value personal items.

Published:Monday, 6th Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Risk Preparedness

23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are trailing behind their global counterparts in risk preparedness. The survey, which gathered insights from 698 insurance executives across 42 territories, indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to the global average. - read more

Surge in Profits for Australian Insurers Following Premium Increases

23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia's insurance sector has reported a substantial after-tax profit of $6.1 billion for the year 2024, according to KPMG's annual review. This figure is three times higher than the five-year average of $2 billion, highlighting a significant financial upturn for the industry. - read more

Significant Premium Increases Reported by Australian Insurers

23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Consumer advocacy group Choice has released a report indicating that several Australian insurers have implemented substantial increases in home insurance premiums over the past year. Notably, Kogan, RAC, and Honey have raised their average premiums by more than 30%, significantly outpacing the industry average increase of 16%. - read more

ICA Advocates for Overhaul of Civil Liability Laws Amid Rising Insurance Premiums

07 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently released a white paper highlighting the urgent need for reforms to state and territory civil liability laws, which have remained largely unchanged for nearly 25 years. These outdated laws are contributing to significant increases in public liability insurance premiums, affecting a wide range of businesses across the nation. - read more

Soaring Insurance Premiums Threaten Australia's Leisure and Recreation Industry

07 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Amusement Leisure & Recreation Association (AALARA) has raised concerns over the escalating costs of public liability insurance, which are placing significant pressure on amusement and recreation operators across the country. This warning follows the Insurance Council of Australia's (ICA) recent call for reforms to civil liability laws. - read more

Click for more Insurance News