Insured Value Disputes: A Closer Look at Claims Resolution

3

Following the claim submission under his home and contents policy, QBE offered to arrange a replacement through a designated jeweler, referred to as Jeweler P. However, the claimant sought a cash settlement instead, prompting QBE to offer $15,048, which reflected the jeweler’s estimate for a suitable substitute.

Frustrated with the compensation amount, the claimant requested the full insured value, raising concerns about the jeweler's qualifications and output quality. This scenario highlights a crucial issue: the perceived mismatch between insured sums and actual claim settlements.

According to the ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the determination of the claimant's compensation was chiefly based on the actual replacement costs rather than the insured amount or premium that had been paid. “The relevant consideration for the purposes of the complainant’s claim is the actual cost the insurer would incur to replace the necklace,” stated AFCA’s ombudsman.

Adding to the complexity, the claimant expressed doubts regarding Jeweler P's capabilities, citing a negative review dated two years prior. Although AFCA acknowledged the claimant’s concerns about the jeweler's reputation and his belief that the suggested replacement was subpar, these factors did not adequately justify a demand for the full insured amount. The ombudsman concluded, “I am not satisfied these matters entitle the complainant to the outcome he seeks.”

In a further analysis, it was revealed that there were discrepancies in the valuation of the necklace. While the insured necklace weighed approximately 156 grams, Jeweler P’s quote was based on a 150-gram estimate. Following this, AFCA indicated that QBE should reassess the replacement cost to align with the revised details provided by the claimant.

AFCA also denied the claimant's request for additional compensation, emphasizing that many of the delays were predominantly due to his insistence on a resolution that was beyond the policy's provisions. This case underscores the importance of understanding both the terms of an insurance policy and the mechanisms of claims processes, especially when expectations revolve around the insured values of personal property.

This incident serves as a reminder for policyholders: the sum insured may not always equate to the cash settlement in the event of a loss, and insurers are likely to adhere strictly to the actual replacement costs as outlined in policy agreements. To navigate such disputes effectively, clear communication and precise documentation during the claims process are imperative.

Details of this case were shared by Insurance News Magazine, shedding light on the finer points of insurance claims involving high-value personal items.

Published:Monday, 6th Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Court Denies E-Scooter Negligence Allegation Against City Council 14 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian court recently ruled in favour of the City of Joondalup, rejecting a negligence claim lodged by an injured e-scooter rider. The Western Australia District Court found the city not liable for an accident involving insurance broker Kirstin Leibbrandt, who collided with a fence post while riding an e-scooter in the Perth suburb of Hillarys. - read more

Mental Health Surpasses Other Causes in TPD Claims, Doubling Payouts Over Five Years 14 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Recent findings from the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) reveal that mental health issues have become the primary cause of Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claims. Insurers disbursed nearly twice the amount for such claims in 2024 compared to five years prior. This data originates from the CALI and KPMG's Cause of Claims Results Report, highlighting a significant shift in the nature of insurance claims. - read more

Impact of Trump Tariffs on Global Insurance Industry 11 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori According to Swiss Re’s latest Sigma report, the growth of property and casualty premiums is moderating in both Australia and globally. This moderation is primarily driven by a slowdown in rate hikes. Additionally, the Trump administration's America First trade policy is putting further pressure on the insurance sector. - read more

Navigating Changes in Australia's Life Insurance Advice Landscape 10 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The conversation on the shifting dynamics in Australia's life insurance advice sector featured Zurich Australia's head of adviser channel, Kieran Forde, and Hayes & Co director, Katherine Hayes. They engaged with editor Chris Dastoor to spotlight the current market conditions and future prospects for financial advisers in this domain. - read more

ASIC Challenges Federal Court's 'Fair Term' Ruling 09 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is appealing a Federal Court decision regarding the wording of a 'pre-existing condition' clause in certain HCF Life insurance products. The court previously determined that while the wording had the potential to mislead consumers, it did not constitute an unfair contract term under the current laws set out in the ASIC Act 2001. - read more